Subscribe to our blog

Your email:

Clinical Architecture Healthcare IT Blog

Current Articles | RSS Feed RSS Feed

Quick Freebie - ISMP Tallman and RxNorm

  | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

On the resources page, I have posted an excel spreadsheet that includes ISMP Tallman drug names and the RxNorm CUIs they are directly and indirectly related to.  The first tab is the ISMP Tallman names and the RxNorm ingredients (TTY=IN) and brand names (TTY=BN).  The second tab lists the relationships between the ISMP Tallman names and more granular RxCUIs.  This was done by creating links based on the RXNREL table from the ingredient and brand names to their related concepts. 

This uses the August 2010 RxNorm data and the latest ISMP Tallman drug names.

Here is my disclaimer - Use this file at your own risk.  If you find any issues with it or have any questions, please let me know.

If you would like these in a pipe delimited test file format, with instructions, you need to email us and let us know who you are so that we may stalk you and fill you email inboxes with spam (not really).

If you find this useful, please let me know.  We are considering maintaining this with each RxNorm update cycle. 

For more information on the Institute for Safe Medication Practices go here: http://www.ismp.org/

For more information on RxNorm go here: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/rxnorm/

For more information on interoperability, clinical decision support or clinical architecture go here: http://www.clinicalarchitecture.com (Wait... you already are here...)

Mapping SNOMED-CT to ICD9 Screencast

  | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

I have completed a new screencast that provides a 17 minute screen castoverview on how to leverage the ICD9 cross map files in the SNOMED-CT optional download.  Grab a sandwich, MS Access and curl up by the monitor and see how this great resource from the NLM can save you some time and effort mapping SNOMED-CT terms to ICD9.

Follow this link to the resource page to access the screencast.

I am always looking for new ideas for screencast.  If you have one email me and let me know.

Have a great week!

SNOMED-CT Essentials and CORE subset screen cast

  | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

I had a request to do a screen cast on the new SNOMED-CT CORE Screen Castsubset.  In order to do it justice, I decided to provide an overview of the SNOMED-CT Essentials terminology and the CORE subset together to provide context for people that are new to both.

Follow this link to check it out.  It is also available on the Resources page.

It is about 20 minutes and I tried a new approach.  I hope you find it useful.

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any feedback or suggestions for future screen casts.

SNOMED CT - CORE Subset - Quick Overview and Impressions

  | Submit to Digg digg it |  Add to delicious  delicious |  Submit to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon | Submit to Reddit reddit 

I recevied an email from the NLM UMLS Users listserv today with the following subject 'CORE Problem List Subset of SNOMED CT Now Available'.  Being a UMLS enthusiast, I quickly downloaded the data and scoped it out.  I thought I would share what I found out with you.

CORE Problem List Subset, What is it?

It is a subset of the complete SNOMED CT terminology that is design to help implementers by acting as a starter set of codes.

There are 5182 terms in the core data released today as opposed to the roughly 386,000 terms in the complete SNOMED CT terminology.

Where did it come from?

The data released today is based on the datasets submitted by the following institutions:

  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • Intermountain Healthcare
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Nebraska University Medical Center
  • Regenstrief Institute
  • Hong Kong Hospital Authority

Why was it created?

This new core subset can provide a vendor or institution with a starter set of common terms that are used to record clinical observations (in fact CORE stands for Clinical Observations Recording and Encoding).

What is in the file that you can download?

The terms that were selected are available in a pipe ‘|' delimited file with the following record format.

 

Position

Field name

Description

1

SNOMED_CID

This is the concept identifier for the term.  (If you are a regular SNOMED enthusiast, this is the same ID that you would find in the SCT_CONCEPTS_yyyymmdd.txt file.)

2

FSN

Fully Specified Name (the term description)

3

CONCEPT_STATUS

This is the concept status of the concept ID in the SCT_CONCEPT file.  According to the extractions rules for the core this should always be zero, which means ‘current'.  (Which also means you can probably ignore this field).

4

UMLS_CUI

Concept Unique Identifier for this SNOMED CT concept in the UMLS Metathesaurus MRCONSO table.

5

OCCURRENCE

The number of contributing institutions that have the concept in their problem list (currently from 1-7).

6

USAGE

The sum of the usage of this term divided by the 7.  (I wonder if this would be better if it was the sum of the usage divided by the occurrence?? - I will follow up with NLM.)

7

IS_RETIRED

This is a field for the future to support when terms are retired.  I would assume that the CONCEPT_STATUS field would also reflect that the SNOMED CT concept is no longer current as well.

Note:  I went back and forth on the USAGE field.  I thought it was interesting that the sum of the usage was divided by the full count of seven and not the OCCURRENCE value.  When you take the USAGE number, multiply it by seven and divide by the OCCURRENCE number the result is, in most cases, a much higher value that reflects the usage of the term within the institutions that are actually using the term.  If you are a big data nerd (like me) the variance in how the terms are ranked depending on which way you look at the usage is interesting.  I am also interested on how the original institutional average was calculated. (once again... nerd).

A Quick Look at the Data

When you take the supplied terms and sort them in order based on the USAGE number, here are the top 25 terms.

When I see this list it seems reasonable to me that these would have a higher usage in a problem or finding list.  All of the terms are at a fairly high level and are the types of things you would expect to have a higher volume of occurances. 

Impressions

If you are just getting started with SNOMED CT and thinking about using it as a reference terminology for tracking findings and problems in your electronic medical record, this new CORE subset is a great starting point.  Kudos to the NLM and the constributing institutions for providing this information - it should facilitate the implementation of SNOMED CT by providing a place to start.

For more information checkout the full write up on the NLM website at:

http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/Snomed/core_subset.html

 

All Posts